Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis

BUGERO N.V.; ILYINA N.A.; ALEXANDROVA S.M.

doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

2022, Vol: 13, Issue: 1

13/1Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Cover Letter
Title Page

« Previous Article

Research Article

J Complement Med Res. 2021; 12(4): 55-58

doi: 10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M..

Cited by (2)

Abstract
Changes in the pathogenicity of opportunistic enterobacteriaceae are currently acquiring more and more medico-biological significance. The rates and scale of transformations of symbiont bacteria do not fit into the norm of the phenotype reaction to changes in environmental conditions. All this determines the intensification of studies of the phenomenon of pathogenicity at the molecular genetic level. This paper presents the results of a molecular genetic analysis of the interactions of E. faecalis in association with Blastocystis spp. in vitro. It was found that the nucleotide sequences of genes that determine the synthesis of pathogenicity factors are found in the studied enterococci in different ratios, and the frequency of detection of fragments of the desired genes changes after their co-cultivation with blastocysts isolated from the feces of gastroenterological patients. The simplest Blastocystis spp. caused an increase in the frequency of occurrence of the gene gelE (gelatinase) in enterococci after their joint cultivation, which is evidence of their influence on the ability to realize the pathogenic potential of associative symbionts.

Key words: Enterococcus faecalis, Blastocystis spp., virulence, PCR

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by BUGERO N.V. Articles by ILYINA N.A. Articles by ALEXANDROVA S.M.
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

REFERENCES

1. Aksoy A, Ãgel K. Kendine zarar verme davraniÃ¾i. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2003; 4:226-236.

2. Connors RE. Self-injury. New York, Jason Aronson, 2000.

3. Hyman J. Women Living with Self-injury. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1999.

4. Favazza AR. The coming of age of self-mutilation. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998; 186:259-268. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

5. Favazza AR, Rosenthal RJ. Diagnostic issues in self mutilation. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1993; 44:134-140.

6. Favazza AR, Conterio K. Female habitual selfmutilators. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989; 79:283-289. [DOI via Crossref]

7. Muehlenkamp JJ, Gutierrez PM. Risk for suicide attempts among adolescents who engage in nonsuicide self-injury. Arch Suicide Res 2007; 11:69-82. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

8. Pattison EM, Kahan J. The deliberate self-harm syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 14:867-872.

9. Aksoy A, Ãgel K. Sokakta yaÃ¾ayan Ã§ocuklarda kendine zarar verme davraniÃ¾i ve madde kullanimi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2005; 6:163-169.

10. Tarlaci N, YeÃ¾ilbursa D, Turkcan S, SaatÃ§ioglu Ã, Yaman M. B kumesi kiÃ¾ilik bozukluklarinda kendini yaralamanin ozellikleri. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1997; 8:29-35.

11. Briere J, Gil E. Self-mutilation in clinical and general population samples: prevalence, correlates and functions. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1998; 68:609-620. [DOI via Crossref]

12. Langbehn D, Pfohl B. Clinical correlates of selfmutilation among psychiatric inpatients. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1993; 5:45-53. [DOI via Crossref]

13. Zoroglu SS, Tuzun Ã, Ãar V, Tutkun H, SavaÃ¾ HA, Ãzturk M, et al. Suicide attempt and selfmutilation among Turkish high school students in relation with abuse, neglect and dissociation. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003; 57:119-126. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

14. BaÃ¾ay BK, BaÃ¾ay Ã, Bildik T, Tamar M, Somer O, Ãzbaran B, ve ark. Ãzmir ili genelinde liseli genÃ§lerde kendine zarar verme davraniÃ¾i: Yayginligi, psikopatoloji ile iliÃ¾kisi ve intihar olasiligi. 16. Ergen Gunleri Ãzet KitapÃ§igi, 2011, s.40.

15. Toprak S, Ãetin Ã, Guven T, Can G, Demircan Ã. Self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among college students. Psychiatry Res 2011; 187:140-144. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

16. Luleci S. Kendini Yaralama DavraniÃ¾i Olan Ergenlerin Psikiyatrik ve Sosyokulturel Ãzellikleri. YayimlanmamiÃ¾ Uzmanlik Tezi, Ãstanbul, Bakirkoy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Ruh Sagligi ve Sinir Hastaliklari Egitim ve AraÃ¾tirma Hastanesi, 2007.

17. Olfson M, Gameroff MJ, Marcus SC, Greenberg T, Shaffer D. National trends in hospitalization of youth with intentional-self-inflicted injuries. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1328-1335. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

18. Dulger HE, Tokdemir M, Tezcan EA, Kuloglu M, Dogan I. Elazig Islahevi’ndeki Ã§ocuk ve ergen hukumlulerde kendini yaralama davraniÃ¾i. DuÃ¾unen Adam 1997; 10:18-21.

19. Herpetz S. Self injurious behavior: Psychopathological and nosological characteristics in subtypes of self-injurers. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1995; 91:57-68. [DOI via Crossref]

20. Derogatis LR. The Brief Symptom Inventory-BSI Administration, Scoring and Procedures ManualII, USA, Clinical Pscyhometric Research Inc, 1992.

21. Ãahin NH, Durak A. Kisa semptom envanteri (Brief Symptom Inventory-BSI): Turk genÃ§leri iÃ§in uyarlanmasi. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi 1994; 31:44-56.

22. Ãahin NH, Durak Batigun A, UgurtaÃ¾ S. Kisa Semptom Envanteri (KSE): Ergenler iÃ§in kullaniminin geÃ§erlik, guvenilirlik ve faktor yapisi. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2002; 13:125-135.

23. Dereboy ÃF, Dereboy Ã, CoÃ¾kun A, CoÃ¾kun B. Ãzdeger duygusu, oz imgesi ve kimlik duygusuII: bir kimlik duygusu degerlendirme aracina dogru on Ã§aliÃ¾ma. Ãocuk ve GenÃ§lik Ruh Sagligi Dergisi 1994; 1:61-69.

24. Demir B, Kaynak Demir H, Sonmez EI. Sense of identity and depression in adolescents. Turk J Pediatr 2010, 52:68-72.

25. Rosenberg M. Society and Adolescent SelfImage. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1965.

26. Ãuhadaroglu F. Adolesanlarda Benlik Saygisi. YayimlanmamiÃ¾ Uzmanlik Tezi, Ankara, Hacettepe Ãniversitesi Tip Fakultesi, 1986.

27. Rodham K, Hawton K, Evans E. Reasons for deliberate self-harm: Comparison of self-poisoners and self-cutters in a community sample of adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 43:80-87. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

28. Nixon MK, Heath NL. Self-injury in Youth. The Essential Guide to Assessment and Intervention, New York, Routledge, 2009.

29. Aktepe E, ÃaliÃ¾kan S, Sonmez Y. Bir universite hastanesinde degerlendirilen kendine zarar veren ergenlerin sosyodemografik ozelliklerinin, aile fonksiyonlarinin ve benlik saygilarinin saptanmasi: Olgu-kontrol Ã§aliÃ¾masi. 16. Ergen Gunleri Ãzet KitapÃ§igi, 2011, s.57.

30. Claes L, Houben A, Vandereycken W, Bijttebier P, Muehlenkamp J. Brief report: the association between non-suicidal self-injury, self-concept and acquaintance with self-injurious peers in a sample of adolescents. J Adolesc 2010; 33:775-778. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

31. Brausch AM, Gutierrez PM. Differences in nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts in adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 2010; 39:233-242. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

32. Erikson EH. Childhood and Society. New York, Norton and Company,1963.

33. Ãuhadaroglu F. Identity confusion and depreÃ¾-sion in groups of adolescents having psychiatric and physical symptoms. Turk J Pediatr 1999; 41:73-9.

34. Kaynak Demir H, Dereboy F, Dereboy C. GenÃ§lerde kimlik bocalamasi ve psikopatoloji. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2009; 20:227-235.

35. Bishop DI, Macylewis JA, Schnekloth CA, Puswella S. Ego identity status and reported alcohol consumption: a study of first-year college students. J Adolesc 1997; 20:209-218. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

36. Jones RM. Ego identity and adolescent problem behaviour. GR Adams, TP Gulotta, R Montemayor (Eds.), Adolescent Identity Formation, Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publication, 1992, p.216-233.

37. Auslander BA, Dunham RM. Bulimia and the diffusion status of ego identity formation: similarities of the empirical descriptors of self and parent. J Adolesc 1996; 29:333-338.

38. Turkbay T, Ãzcan C, Doruk A, Uzun Ã. Ergenlerin psikiyatrik belirtileri ve benlik saygilari uzerine kimlik bocalamasinin etkileri. Turkiye’de Psikiyatri 2005; 7:92-97.

39. BaÃ¾ay BK, BaÃ¾ay Ã, Bildik T, Tamar M, Somer O, Ãzbaran B, ve ark. Lise ogrencilerinde kendine zarar verme davraniÃ¾i: ÃÃ¾levleri, emosyonel regulasyon ve ayrilma bireyleÃ¾me. 16. Ergen Gunleri Ãzet KitapÃ§igi, 2011, s.34.

This Article Cited By the following articles

Cinsiyet ve YaÅ FarklÄ±lÄ±klarÄ±nÄ±n Ergenlerin Depresyon, Anksiyete BozukluÄu, Kendine Zarar Verme, Psikoz, Travma SonrasÄ± Stres BozukluÄu, Alkol-UyuÅturucu BaÄÄ±mlÄ±lÄ±ÄÄ± ve Dikkat EksikliÄi Hiperaktivite BozukluÄu Ä°le Ä°liÅkili Sorunlara 2018; (): 255.	1

Youth self-harm in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review of the risk and protective factors Int J Soc Psychiatry 2017; 63(4): 359.	2

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. J Complement Med Res. 2021; 12(4): 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Web Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. https://www.jocmr.com/?mno=35961 [Access: April 25, 2022]. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. J Complement Med Res. 2021; 12(4): 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. J Complement Med Res. (2021), [cited April 25, 2022]; 12(4): 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Harvard Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M. (2021) Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. J Complement Med Res, 12 (4), 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Turabian Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. 2021. Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 12 (4), 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

Chicago Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M.. "Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 12 (2021), 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

BUGERO N.V., ILYINA N.A., ALEXANDROVA S.M. (2021) Laboratory Model of Molecular-Genetic Interactions of the Protose Blastocystis Spp. With Bacteria Enterococcus Faecalis. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 12 (4), 55-58. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2021.12.04.08



Copyright � 2022 Journal of Complementary Medicine Research All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Complementary Medicine Research. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information Journal of Complementary Medicine Research Hosted by Ejmanager C/O Sukasiree Publication, 3990 Hillsboro Pike, Suite 330 Nashville,USA Email : editorjocmr@gmail.com

Contact Information

How to cite this article